Tuesday, March 21, 2017

Cultural Versus Technological Singularity


Joe Biden and Barack Obama

Dear Vice President Biden,

It has been over two years since you have been sworn into office as the Vice President of the United States. The Salton Sea in California is chemically despoiled. The Chemical Assault Scorched Earth which began on June 17, 1987 has been well within your cognition. During the months that followed you were a leading senator investigating the Iran Contra Scandal.

It is objectively from a linear perspective a catalyst to attack the human race using the United States as an instrument. Subjectively it is protected by a red herring or distraction based on polymorphous perversity. This is essentially ad hominem attacks based on a Male Gay orientation.

I am have been strictly heterosexual all my life. I am one day senior to President Barack Obama being born on August 3, 1961 in Roswell, New Mexico for those interested in the Birther perspective.

This sexually based attack will also attack my Vedic or Hare Krishna Movement beliefs.

These abuses violate my Bill of Rights protections that you and Obama have sworn to uphold. The 8th Amendment gives me protection from cruel and unusual treatment.

In continuation, the 14th Amendment gives me due process and equal rights safeguards which are non existent.

Economically from a non proportional outputs and aggregates of production standpoint, if one would examine products inside a grocery store here Along The Salton Sea, almost 90 percent are contaminated. Many have been chemically tagged from the factory from which they were made. Many are from Mexico and some from as far away as China.

The scope of substitution on a production line is quite evident. Similar to a smuggler inserting contraband into a can of beans, chemicals have been added to many products and placed around my person and others. From what I understand there are times, when the population of many small towns have to eat what I am eating. This means they are being chemically assaulted. I have only drank clean water when I harvest such from snow. Generally speaking I have not drank water since February of 2007.

The History of your Vice Presidency and that of the State of Delaware from June 17, 1987 is a false one.

A Cultural Singularity based on a mathematical Pole singularity has been developed through prisoner’s dilemma and delivered on a schedule. A basic Pole Singularity is expressed as f(z) (1/zn). Technological Singularity is predicted to occur in 2045. The hardware shows empirical support for a computing machine to match the complexity of the human brain. Subjectively the crystal perspective of Artificial Intelligence does not give support for competent and transparent software to be developed by this date.

Technological Singularity raises the standard and baseline of culture predicted on a renaissance of Superintelligence as machines become superior to humans. Hence success means the delivery of Quality.

The Obama Administration and the previous four presidencies form a Perfect Dictatorship or the Irrationalist Presidents. This is term coined by Cambridge Law School, the alleged authorship and Origin.

They are MSM or Male Same Sex Males. Their Strategic Mission was Gay or Same Sex Marriage. Delaware has passed an Opposite Sex Civil Union Bill and is being sent to Governor Markell in the past week.

The emergence of Technological Singularity contains many components of the Obama Administration's philosophy, renewable energy, education, and competitiveness.

Alienating me from my Constitutional Rights was a reactionary process and severely jeopardizes human civilization and the stability of the United States. The antagonistic movement of the Cultural Singularity and Technological Singularity weakens the Strawman presentation of yourself and Obama. As the arc of lifespan passes persons will realize the damage that has occurred to themselves, families, and property. LAPD, who is leading this mobilization will not be able to continue to Obstruct Justice to protect the president.

In correlation the CDC estimates that 1 million persons are living HIV AIDS positive in this country. There are about 1.2 million cases. About 50% are MSM men. This population is the next most likely group to demand justice.

It is your legal duty and interest to recognize my rights and others who are being marginalized by a Chemical Assault Scorched Earth on the United States.

Thank you for your consideration.

Bhakta David Nollmeyer

Desert Shores CA

April 16, 2011



Wednesday, March 15, 2017

Open Letter to California Attorney General: Kamala Harris


This letter is being reposted here because of the importance of whom now Senator Kamala Harris is. She was clearly in charge of Homelad Security officers in California through her term as Attorney General. The letter is self explanatory.


Bhakta David Nollmeyer

Desert Shores CA

March 15, 2017

Kamala Harris

Dear Attorney General Kamala Harris,

In the past week ex Homeland Secretary Janet Napolitano has resigned from the Obama Administration. The regents approved her for the post of the President of the University of California on July 18, 2013. This rapid paradigm shift has focalized what is named MOEC or Mobilization of Empire and Civilization. This is the name of the actual in continuo Chemical Assault Scorched Earth program imposed over my natural person and citizenship here in Westwood, Lassen County, California.

Two Simultaneous Eternities Can Not Exist

At issue is the Sovereign Citizen Relationship and the alienation of my Bill of Right protections. For simplicities purpose we will argue the 8th Amendment, There shall be no cruel and unusual punishment, and the 14th Amendment Equal Protection and Due Process clause.

This Undermining attack is alleged to be the authorship of Cambridge Law School, United Kingdom. These actors have developed a Gay Militia that is guiding the attack from Los Angeles Police Department. There is an ideological construction known as Gay Irrationalism Gay Know Nothing that reflects these actor’s human repertoire of intents and actions.

The attack is predicated on a Same Sex Qualification for Constitutional Rights. I am heterosexual.

The algorithm moves from (United Kingdom) Cambridge Law School, Scotland Yard, (United States), LAPD, State of California, the LGBTi Movement to attack my natural person and citizenship. Heterosexuals as myself are involved also but the bias is overwhelmingly LGBTi.

This action is an informant based operation where one either cooperates with the United States Constitution or betrays to MOEC.

There are three major components of this stage of MOEC: Gang Stalking, Electronic Surveillance, Chemical Warfare. MOEC attempts to create a pathology of failure. Hence one LGBTi police officer is able to decide whether to halt the above three components directly attacking my person.

MOEC is a chemical assault, homosexual blackmail, extortion, obstruction of justice, and intimidation of a witness ring. Marijuana trafficking and growing is a basis to create a racketeering informant system to Undermine Civilization. This spreads to food, clothing, shelter, and reproduction.

There have been three code names of officers that are prominent in MOEC: Periander, The Fly, Dodo.

Dodo is the officer in question who is running the Chemical Assault Scorched Earth.

I am the Singularity Experiment and Barack Obama is the Singularity Target.

I was born in Roswell, New Mexico in 1961. I will be 52 on August 3, and Obama will be 52 on August 4. We are therefore cohort rivals under both an Ideal Father and Mother Figure and our natural parents.

The attack focalizes on the Third Generation Grandparents as a baseline to Undermine. This would yield 8 surnames. Dodo’s extended family will be aware of his fall as an LGBTi officer in LAPD as will all the other alleged 250 – 500 officers in the Gay Militia.

The same can be true from those followers of the quid pro quo Yellow Brick Road here who are informants to Dodo in the Lassen, Plumas, and Siskiyou County area in California.

Equal Protection and Due Process should be applied nationwide. The surname of Prince William, The Duke of Cambridge whom has just produced charge is Nelson.

A Yellow Brick Road Trojan Horse has been embedded successfully in American and World Culture.

A Marriage Breaking program is disguised as a Marriage Making program. This is a KEY Concept in Gay Irrationalism Gay Know Nothing. The Chemical Assault Scorched Earth is tagged to Gay Marriage. Historically you have performed the first Gay Marriage in California after the defeat of Proposition 8.

I supported Proposition 8 based on my own natural reason and Vedic beliefs without coercion.

The Proximate Cause Test sine qua non, is a very important consideration for you as a natural person and Attorney General for the State of California.

Lake Almanor, in adjacent Plumas County is completely a toxic waste land. The air and food for at least 100 miles radius is contaminated from vehicles who are driving in the vicinity with despoiled fuel. Food is contaminated from the factory. I am a vegetarian and these foodstuffs are deliberately attacked more than meat.

The stalking is so poor that persons lay in wait at the minimart, post office, and store to attack persons under cue from the Gay Militia. Hence they operate as a Gay Militia that is radiated from LAPD, City of Los Angeles and Los Angeles County.

Cognitive Behaviorism stresses punishment as a short term behavior modifier and education as a long term modifier. Napolitano's appointment to the President of UC California reflects this methodology.

As seen, I am first a natural person and then a citizen of the United States and California. It is clear the the proximate cause sine qua non has transformed the United States and California into the Machinery of Torture.

If criminal and civil charges were filed against the Sheriff and District Attorney of Lassen, this County would go immediately into bankruptcy. Plumas alone is $1.5 behind on it's budget. The very first suit would push these rural counties over the edge. The insurance companies will not pay out on simple liability claims to criminals. There is a problem with 90 percent of the population. Lassen will attempt to press charges and counter sue LAPD, City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles, United States, Cambridge Law School and the United Kingdom.

You are correctly brought as the County can represent the State in all actions in California. Internationally you are also criminally and civilly liable as LAPD is responsible for many actions especially in Mexico.


I am alleging that you, Barack Obama, and Janet Napolitano are guilty of War Crimes and or Crimes Against Humanity. As seen the Wizard of Oz here is a Gay Militia member of LAPD. The intent to create the worst person in United States History has a LGBTi policeman who although aware will not renounce the conspiracy. The major fallacy in Informant Reinforcement is a Justification – Positive self defense. Stand you own ground and the duty to retreat are null if one is an agent of a Criminal Principal, Accomplice or Accessory.

Instead the Morgenthau Pathology exponentially develops: 1. Miscalculation 2. Escalation 3. Failure to punishment culpable actors. 4. Failure to implement a system remedying deficiencies.

As the Chief Law Officer of California you have been Undermined by rogue cells of MSM male officers in LAPD who operate through Mutual Aid Violations.

I have developed MOEC Studies to the level of an Approach. This is less than a system, but the results are very strong. It is the mechanism that expands the British Empire. It is a novelty of prisoner’s dilemma.

The University of California now is fully entangled in the Machinery of Torture. It's staff of world class academics are en prise as dependent actors to accomplices.

The proximate cause sine qua non, principals, accomplices, and accessories should all be named and prosecuted.

Thank you for your consideration.

Bhakta David Nollmeyer

Westwood CA

July 27, 2013




MOEC: Mobilization of Empire and Civilization

Facebook: MOEC Studies


Google Plus


MOEC Studies















HIV AIDS Position Paper



Monday, March 13, 2017




A SEARCH is by definition an invasion of privacy. Prior to Katz v. U.S. (1967), privacy was defined in terms of the trespass doctrine, but since then, a "reasonable expectation of privacy" doctrine has prevailed. Only what people themselves deem "private" and what society recognizes as private are protected. The Fourth Amendment does NOT protect against all invasions of privacy; it only forbids unreasonable searches and seizures.

Technically, the Fourth Amendment says that all searches are to be conducted under authority of a warrant (the warrant rule). Warrants can be issued to search premises (dwellings), vehicles, or persons. The Fourth Amendment also states that probable cause (the probable cause requirement) should form the basis of warrants, supported by oath or affirmation. There are different definitions of probable cause, from what a person of reasonable caution or prudence would believe in connection with a crime or criminal offender to what would make a reasonable person to more probably than not believe a guilty rather than innocent interpretation of facts, hearsay, or a combination of the two. The trend is toward the "more probable than not" test. For example, in informant law, the Aguilar Test (1964) was established approving anonymous informant tips if (a) it could be shown the informant was reliable, and (b) some underlying information could be provided to show how the informant reached the information in their tip. This two pronged test was replaced by a "totality of circumstances" test in Illinois v. Gates (1983) in which a reviewing magistrate uses practical common sense, given all the circumstances set forth in the affidavit, to decide if there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.

Warrants must be executed promptly (within 48 hours in some states; at least within 10 days in other states) and not usually at night or on Sundays unless otherwise stated. So called "no knock warrants" can be issued if the "exigent circumstances" test is met; i.e., evidence can be easily destroyed or flushed, a hostage situation exists, and the case involves explosives, emergencies, danger to officers, or unusual circumstances. All warrants, not just no knock warrants, authorize the use of force to enter a dwelling if police are denied entrance or no one is there to admit them. The "demand and refusal" element of the "knock and announce" rule has been eliminated. A warrant must include a street address and description of the location; e.g., 110 S. Main, a two story white house. A warrant for one side of a duplex does not authorize search of the other side, and the same is true of apartments. A warrant must describe as fully as possible all the things to be looked for in connection with a crime that has been committed or is about to be committed. The descriptions must be specific; e.g., one black 21' Panasonic TV, serial number 63412X. The described item(s) are usually provided in boilerplate fashion on the warrant form itself (with an indication to strike inapplicable paragraphs). Finally, a valid warrant must be signed by a judge. The most important thing about searches is that their scope must be narrow. General, exploratory searches are unconstitutional.

A SEIZURE is by definition the deprivation of liberty, or the enjoyment in exercising dominion or control over a thing, be it property or person. Police can temporarily seize private property for about 14 days (this varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction), and usually hold it indefinitely if it is material evidence in a criminal case. Temporary seizure or detention of a person is allowed for shorter periods of time, usually 72 hours. Asset forfeiture laws have been recently applied in criminal cases, to show that crime does not pay. While these are technically civil law procedures that exist on both federal and state levels, seized property can be auctioned off for money to fund the criminal justice system, or in some cases, used by the police departments themselves in operations; e.g., as an undercover vehicle. With asset forfeiture, the crime must fall under the R.I.C.O. (Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organization) Act, or be part of on ongoing criminal enterprise designed to be profitable, such as drug dealing. In most cases, a person who has had their assets seized under forfeiture laws must make a showing of good cause why the property should be returned in civil court within 90 days.

The EXCLUSIONARY RULE and common law time frames provide protection against unreasonable seizures. The purpose of the exclusionary rule (briefly, evidence illegally obtained cannot be legally admitted), first created by Weeks v. U.S. (1914) and made applicable to the states via Mapp v. Ohio (1961) is often misunderstood. It is NOT designed to protect the constitutional rights of suspects, but to penalize police and deter police misconduct. The exclusionary rule is a judicial mandate designed to help professionalize the police; it's a social experiment, not a guarantee of constitutional safeguards. It's a rather harsh rule, the reasoning being that it is better to let some of the guilty go free so that the majority of people would benefit from more thorough and professional police work. The Court appears to be waiting for social science to answer when this goal is reached, but it represents an under researched topic in Justice Studies, if indeed, it is researchable at all. The exclusionary rule also subsumes the FRUIT OF THE POISONOUS TREE DOCTRINE, first established in Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. U.S. (1920). According to this doctrine, not only is evidence illegally seized inadmissible, but any evidence or testimony obtained later as a result of the illegally seized evidence is inadmissible. This has been somewhat weakened by the good faith exception (explained below), but it basically means that any secondary, incriminating facts or leads discovered later in a case from an earlier, illegal seizure are inadmissible. If the "tree" is tainted, the "fruits" are also tainted. This usually results in not enough evidence to go to trial. One loophole is the purged taint exception, which applies if the defendant broke the chain of evidence themselves, and came forward with new evidence, like a spontaneous confession, about a related crime. Another loophole is the inevitable discovery doctrine (also explained below).


For many reasons, not necessarily only because of harshness, there have evolved numerous EXCEPTIONS (precedents) to the warrant rule and the exclusionary rule. Often, these precedents are interrelated in actual police practice. These are listed below by their technical names in alphabetical order:

Automobile Search Exception: First established in Carroll v. U.S. (1925) as part of Prohibition era laws allowing roadblocks and checkpoints. Later, amended to allow free and unfettered passage on public highways. Police can generally open luggage and parcels in the passenger compartment; a search of the trunk requires special justification. However, Chambers v. Moroney (1970) ruled that an automobile search need not be made immediately. All that is necessary in a probable cause stop is to confiscate the parked vehicle after the driver has been arrested, take it to headquarters, and do a complete inventory on it's contents. Any and all evidence found in the vehicle can be legally seized. Inventory and search are technically different, but in practice, both are done at the same time. (See Moving Vehicle Probable Cause Doctrine and Inventory Search Exception).

Border Search Exception: The basic idea here is that special attention should be paid to a nation's borders and certain transportation routes. For this reason, immigration points and international airports can search and seize (for as long as 16 hours) on the basis of reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause. Also allowed is "drug courier profiling" of suspicious persons that may be transporting contraband along a commonly used Interstate or airport for drug trafficking. Profiling stops have also been authorized for people who appear to be soliciting prostitutes.

Chimel Rule: Briefly, a warrantless search is allowed if incidental (simultaneous) to a lawful arrest, i.e., serving an arrest warrant without a search warrant. Only the area under a suspect's immediate control can be searched, and this can be for evidence that has nothing to do with the cause for arrest. Also a "protective sweep search" is appropriate for dwelling areas, such as closets or closed doors for hidden attackers. The Chimel derives from Chimel v. California (1969), a case where police literally ransacked a house. Chimel also applies to hot pursuit or chase situations where a suspect can be taken back to show the spot where weapons or drugs were discarded, but this more often involves a public safety exception to the Miranda Rule. Strip searches (down to the underwear) can ONLY be done when the prisoner is in a secure facility. Vehicles used to transport prisoners MUST be searched prior and after transport in order to prove something was discarded during transport. Cavity searches can be done at booking, but are best left to medical personnel, but some departments allow officers to do them.

Consent Search ExceptionA person who possesses common authority or has frequent access over the premises; e.g., girlfriend, landlord, etc. can authorize a consent search within limits (NOT the whole house) if their waiver of rights is voluntary (they understand it can be revoked at anytime during the search) and made intelligently (NOT just in acquiescence or mere submission to police authority). Many departments require signing a Miranda type consent form. Silence, simple nodding of the head, or waving the police in an open door is NOT consent.

Crime Scene Search Exception: Police have enormous powers regarding the securing of crime scenes. They can order people to move or not to move about. They can "freeze" suspicious situations. They can commandeer (immediately seize) property, vehicles, or residences for evidence, transport, or temporary headquarters. Force can also be used to prevent contamination of the scene. A restriction at crime scenes and other searches is the elephant in a matchbox doctrine, which requires searchers consider the probable size and shape of the evidence they seek, since large objects cannot be concealed in tiny areas. Ignoring this doctrine usually results in leaving the place a shambles.

Emergency Situation Exception: The letter of the law regarding warrants need not be applied strictly in situations with probable cause and no time to secure a warrant; e.g., shots being fired or a person screaming. Applies to searches that must be conducted immediately, and has been extended to include fingernail scrapings, blood samples, and urine tests. A danger to life, or danger of escape should exist, but most often, used in situations where delay would cause destruction or removal of evidence.

Good Faith Doctrine: Originally emerged as exception to exclusionary rule and is now the most rapidly expanding exception. It was first applied when police executed what they believed to be valid warrants later overturned on technical grounds due to fault of the issuing magistrate in assessing probable cause and nexus (the connection between PC and accused's participation in elements of criminal offense). Based on two cases in 1984, U.S. v. Leon and Massachusetts v. Sheppard, the doctrine holds that if police are truly unaware they are violating someone's 4th Amendment rights, the evidence can be admitted anyway. This has been extended somewhat to apply in situations where police acting "under color of law" due to existence of a specific state statute; e.g., safety inspections, proceeding with a warrantless search because application of the exclusionary rule in these situations does not coincide with purpose (deterrence) of the exclusionary rule.

Inevitable Discovery Doctrine: Designed as a built in loophole to the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine and based on Nix v. Williams (1984), the doctrine holds that if illegally obtained evidence would in all likelihood eventually have been discovered anyway, it is admissible. For example, if police obtained an illegal confession and cooperation from a suspect in locating where bodies were buried, AND police were conducting their own independent search of an area for bodies but had given up, the help of the suspect in locating the bodies would be a natural extension of proper police methods as if the police had never terminated their search. Although the confession is illegal, the dead bodies are admissible evidence. The reasoning behind inevitable discovery (not to be confused with inadvertent discovery in Plain View Doctrine) is to restore police to the same position they would have been if no police error or misconduct had occurred.

Inventory Search Exception: When police take custody of property, proper inventory procedures allow searches to protect the owner’s property, protect the department from disputes and claims, protect the police and public from danger (check for bombs, etc.), and to determine the owner’s identity. Also called Impoundment Doctrine because anytime police confiscate something that has been abandoned, is blocking traffic, is illegally parked, or has been left without a driver after the driver has been arrested (see Automobile Exception), police are usually required by law or regulation to search the contents while impounding it. Colorado v. Burtine (1987) does not give police carte blanche authority to search all impounded objects indiscriminately, only when a specific inventory is justified.

Moving Vehicle Probable Cause Doctrine: An automobile, truck, van, motorhome, boat, airplane or other movable object can be searched IF there is (a) probable cause (b) the vehicle is moving or about to be moved, and (c) a warrant cannot be readily obtained. Every part of the vehicle can be searched, including closed containers in the trunk, although special justification is needed for trunks. Diminished expectations of privacy are assumed to exist with moving vehicles. Probable cause can be easily established via police dogs, who have a sense of smell six million times greater than that of a human.

Open Fields Doctrine: Only houses, papers, effects and "curtilage" are protected; open fields even if amounting to trespass are NOT. Areas outside the "curtilage" can be searched; e.g., a barn 50 yards away. "Curtilage" may or may not be a fence. It depends on (a) proximity to house (b) whether area is within an enclosure surrounding the home (c) the uses to which the area is put, and (d) any steps taken to protect the area from observation. For example, a garbage or trash can placed out on the curb is NOT protected; a garbage or trash can on the porch needs a warrant to be searched. Derived from Oliver v. U.S. (1984) and upheld in U.S. v. Dunn (1992). Abandoned effects, wastepaper baskets, and public places, including bathroom stalls, are NOT protected.

Plain View Doctrine: This refers to police use of their senses: sight, hearing, smell, taste, and touch. Anything detected by these means does NOT have Fourth Amendment protection if officers are lawfully present when they detect something by these means. A number of subdoctrines have developed, such as "plain feel", "plain smell", and "plain hearing", and the current controversy is whether electronic aids for the senses constitute a search or should be part of the Plain View Doctrine. In general, evidence of ANOTHER crime that is immediately observable without a search is seizable. In 1971, the standard was "inadvertent discovery" (not necessarily looking for anything incriminating; e.g., looking inside car to read VIN number or fix fuse and seeing weapon under dashboard or car seat) but due to courts being unable to define "inadvertent discovery", this standard was abolished in Horton v. California (1990) and replaced with a three prong test: (a) officer engaged in lawful activity at the time; (b) the object's incriminating character was immediately apparent and not concealed, and (c) the officer had lawful access to the object and it was discovered accidentally. For example, in a roadside stop, the driver opens a glove box to get their registration or proof of insurance, and the officer views what in his or her experience looks like a container of drugs or a weapon.

Private Individual Search Exception: If the police come upon evidence obtained by employees of a private carrier, such as Federal Express, bicycle delivery, rental car or limousine service (to name a few), or private security (hotel detectives, department store security guards, etc.) no warrant is required and the evidence is admissible. Such private individuals are not subject to the same Fourth Amendment provisions as government officials. This exception applies only if the private search for evidence is made without the knowledge or participation of a government agent. This exception applies to residences as well as public places. If, for example, a girlfriend makes a private inspection of her boyfriend's closet, finds stolen guns, and turns them over to police, the evidence is admissible against the boyfriend. Where controversy exists is in the definition of "government officials", certain quasi public police departments (i.e., port police, transit police) are allowed to do warrantless searches, and the Court has held that probation officers, although government officials for most purposes, have the right to justify searches under less than probable cause.

Stop & Frisk Rule (Terry v. Ohio): A frisk or patdown of the outer clothing is NOT technically a search, but whenever police restrain a person's freedom to walk away, a seizure has occurred. To frisk, police must have "reasonable suspicion" (not merely a can't put into words hunch) and the frisk must be for weapons only, unless under the plain feel exception. Furtive movements, inappropriate attire, carrying suspicious objects, vague answers to questions, refusal to identify oneself, and appearing to be out of place are all grounds for articulable suspicion. This has been extended to roadside stops, luggage, suspicion of narcotics possession (in many cases, also requiring a trained dog to establish probable cause). Often produces evidence other than weapons that come into "plain view", demonstrating the interrelationships among these precedents.

Student Search Exception: The Court has maintained that schools, in order to maintain an atmosphere of learning, must have eased restrictions on search by school officials. The standard is reasonableness under all circumstances, which means that there must be reason to believe a search would turn up evidence, the procedure must be related to the search for evidence (and not for disciplinary purposes), and the search is not intrusive nor discriminatory on the basis of age, sex, or race. Numerous cases been upheld, but New Jersey v. T.L.O. (1985) is significant.


About.com Civil Liberties Guide to Search and Seizure

Nolo's Understanding Search and Seizure Law


Creamer, S. (1980). The Law of Arrest, Search and Seizure. NY: Holt.

McWhirter, D. (1994). Search, Seizure, and Privacy. Phoenix: Oryx Press. Last updated: 06/25/03

Lecture List for Constitutional Law

Stevens, M. (2003). Search and Seizure: A Guide To Rules, Requirements, Tests, Doctrines, And, Exceptions. Retrieved May 16, 2012:http://faculty.ncwc.edu/mstevens/410/410lect14.htm

MOEC: Mobilization of Empire and Civilization

Facebook: MOEC Studies


Google Plus


MOEC Studies















Tuesday, March 7, 2017

MOEC Studies Links




MOEC: Mobilization of Empire and Civilization

Facebook: MOEC Studies


Google Plus


MOEC Studies















HIV AIDS Position Paper



Political Figures


Ronald Reagan


Barack Obama








Joe Biden


Donald Trump


Arnold Schwarzenegger



Hillary Clinton


Geir Lundestad





Universities, Police Agencies, & Locations








Supporting MOEC Sites





























Social Science











Other Sites

Chemical Assault: Challenge to Leadership


Gaudiya Vaishnava
















Friday, March 3, 2017

Complaint: CA Governor Edmund Brown

CA Governor Edmund BrownCA Attorney General Xavier Becerra
Governor Edmund Brown                  Attorney General Xavier Becerra

Dear Attorney General Xavier Beccera,

I am writing to you to file a Complaint against Governor Edmund Brown, as a natural person and sworn duty bound California state official.


(4) Nothing in this subdivision supersedes or modifies any provision of this Constitution, including the guarantees that a person may not be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, or denied equal protection of the laws, as provided in Section 7.


The United States has been held under a prima facie Chemical Assault Scorched Earth since June 17, 1987. This attack against the United States it's citizens, territory, and laws is imposed over my natural person, Bhakta David Nollmeyer, federal and state citizenship of which the latter you have jurisdiction.In this experiment secondary, tertiary, ad infinitum targets are followed in roster being exposed to this attack.

The Salton Sea is the greatest piece of evidence. It has been TOTALLY Chemically Despoiled through three Presidential Elections and Inaugurations. Barack Obama won in 2008 and 2012 and now Donald Trump has won in 2016.

At issue is a very solid allegation that the Proximate Cause sine qua non is Cambridge Law School and their co principal LAPD. The attack is base on a homosexual or same sex qualification for legal recognition before the state. In this instance I am being told that I needed to have three anal sex intercourses to avoid the attack from occurring. Ronald Reagan was President on June 17, 1987. On June 12, 1987, the 500th Anniversary of Berlin, President Ronald Reagan travelled to this boundary city between the USSR and so called free world. Reagan gave what is considered to be a historic speech against totalitarianism.

The attack which is named Mobilization of Empire and Civilization or MOEC is the prisoner's dilemma driven mechanism which expands and contracts the British Empire. It's Authorship or Membership are alleged to have been MSM or Male Same Sex Male. In brief I have not supported Gay Marriage or Marriage Equality based on Vedic Hare Krishna faith. I am also heavily attacked because I am vegetarian. Vegetarian sources of food are attacked more severely than meat.

MOEC is based on differentiation based on the Totality of Circumstances Test. It proceeds from 100 points to 10 percent classes. Alter Ego outliers are important. MOEC has components that very closely resemble Behavioral Statistics as FBI Uniform Crime Reporting and CDC Surveillance Reports.

Statement of Facts

The air, water, and products in stores are all contaminated inclusive of the Salton Sea between Monday, February 27 and March 3, 2017. The products in stores as the Arco, and Post Office in Salton City are contaminated. The air is caustic as well as having a tranquilizing effect. The electronic surveillance reflects Gay Irrationalism Gay Know Nothing banter. Western Rationalism has been the prevailing system of management circa the 1700s and the Know Nothings were an anti immigrant movement after the Civil War.

Governor Brown has been aware on the Chemical Assault on the State of California since January 9, 2007. He is under the color of law. His de facto and ommissive behavior is the Misprision of Treason. At the civil level this attack can be construed as a collective action of behalf of all 38 million residents and persons in California. The implication is that LAPD is a hub in a node of informants, saboteurs, and traitors radiating through every police stationhouse in the United States.


Governor Brown and the State of California bear the burden for the attack on Life, Limb, and Property, any excuse as an Attorney General Exemption for Barack Obama or Donald Trump is a farce as in a Hot Pursuit or any other Exception. You as Attorney General for California are capacitated and bound to decapitate and bring the principals, accomplices, and accessories to justice before the court.

Thank you for your consideration.

Bhakta David Nollmeyer

March 3, 2017


MOEC: Mobilization of Empire and Civilization

Facebook: MOEC Studies


Google Plus


MOEC Studies















Wednesday, February 8, 2017

MOEC Denial Holocaust Denial


Holocuast Denial Laws

Arguing from object science and facts is strongly desired. The question of facts is moot. The Chemical Assault Scorched Earth is real. The scope of such laws cover the Nazi party, hate, xenophobia, genocide, and denial and trivialisation of the Holocaust. MOEC is a Cultural Singularity. The state sponsored terror is significant. There are zero know sworn officials to my knowledge that admit what is going on. There are zero human rights groups also. On this list is Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and Simon Wisenthal Center. Academically speaking the University of Cambridge, University of California and all Ivy League schools top the list.

I am also expresing concerns with major corporations and CEOs. Companies as Google, Microsoft, Apple, and Virgin are of interest. Barack Obama and Richard Branson have made the news competing in watersports. Why don't they attemmpt this is in the Salton Sea where such is a Scorched Earth? This is going to increase their brand. The distortions of Donald Trump are also a concern. This nativistic populism approach is based on power, control, and numbers not merit based skill. Engineers will automate the 20th Century into obsolesence very soon for many workers who are not competitive.

Laws against Holocaust denial. (2017). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 21:02, February 8, 2017, from:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Laws_against_Holocaust_denial&oldid=763111450

Sunday, February 1, 2015

Obama: Six Years of Sanitization

Barack Obama has surpassed six years as President of the United States. Obama has mens rea or committed criminal intent and actus rea criminal act from his history as United States Senator in continuo.

Obama ran for president on two occasions winning both races in 2008 and 2012 clearly cognizable that a Chemical Assault Scorched Earth was occurring domestically. This has also placed the United States and his person at peril internationally.

In the particular, the Salton Sea in California was Chemically Despoiled on Election Day in 2008 and 2012.

The killing off of conscience, that of which is right or wrong clearly defined the Human Rights record of Obama and the United States sine June 17, 1987, under Ronald Reagan when the manifest attacks began.

The University of Cambridge, United Kingdom is the alleged proximate cause.

To date there has been no credible effort in a world of 7.4 billion persons to decapitate the structure of MOEC.

It appears that a hub and node conspiracy has been built through every police station house worldwide or group that performs homeland security. This would place:

England is the Mind
The United States is the Bodyguard

A possible War Crimes Trial in the future is an outcome. Obama will be 53.5 on February 4, 2015.